• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    272 years ago

    I’ve had players try to argue that the mouth of a creature etc. is a “container.” It gets frustrating sometimes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      One solution is to make clear that once the PCs start using “creative” solutions, so will the NPCs. The players usually don’t want the game to devolve to that point either.

      • wia
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Yup. When I DM my rule of thumb had always been “if you have to argue the point, then it’s just not valid”.

        We’re not struggling creativity, we’re just cutting off rules mangling like this situation.

      • mrbubblesort
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Sure you can do create water in his mouth. Next turn as his free action he swallows, then he attacks you, hits, and you take 2d6 dmg.

    • Norgur
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      No problem. There is a reflex called “coughing”. Wonder why we all have that :p

        • Norgur
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I assumed they’d treat the mouth down to the lungs as one “open container”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            “open mouth” as an open container is already a stretch.

            “open mouth all the way down the lungs” as an open container is just bullshit. Rule of Cool definitely does not apply. That is not creative or cool in any way.

    • Psaldorn
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I don’t see a flaw, but it shouldn’t be instant death either. An easy constitution check or something to cough it up?

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        It doesn’t work RAW. The spell will fail because the enemy (the entire enemey) is classified as a creature, not an object and container is a subcategory of object.