-
poor leftists talk about poverty, labor aristocrats get uncomfortable and insist that sociological classes aren’t materialist. “all that matters is that we’re working class - we’re all in this together”
-
black leftists talk about racism, whites get uncomfortable and insist that they’re not personally part of the problem. “we mustn’t allow the bourgeois to divide the proletariat along racial lines - we’re all in this together”
-
female leftists talk about patriarchy, men get uncomfortable and insist that it hurts them too. “this men vs women stuff is reductive anyway - we’re all in this together”
-
third world leftists talk about imperialism, americoids get uncomfortable and insist that red white and blue lives matter too. “what happened to the international working class - we’re all in this together”
you don’t have to invite yourself to every form and experience of oppression. anyone with a baby’s consciousness of intersectionality ought to be capable of admitting when they have privilege
Wtf I didn’t interpret it that way at all lmao, I thought it was a funny joke about California having nice weather or something which made you not want to leave
I’m too innocent
I still love the song but the lyrics were directly about being “tricked” into a public mental health institution, the kind that ceased to exist for the most part after Reagan’s “reforms.”
That seems like a stretch. I highly doubt public mental health facilities have ever been synonymous with intoxicating opulence.
They weren’t, but they still existed for those in dire need of a place to stay and access to medication.
They don’t have to be “opulent” to be that and closing pretty much all of them left every single person kicked out of them on the street, many of them permanently. That’s a little worse than “not opulent.”
Kicking a lot of mentally ill people out onto the streets was an atrocity, no argument from me there.
I’m arguing that Hotel California being about mental hospitals doesn’t make sense. There are so many lines that run counter to that interpretation:
The . . . intake nurse?
Even if the staff can afford some luxuries, it doesn’t seem like something they’d discuss with a patient.
Said nobody about an inpatient mental health facility ever
A hazard and contraband that would be immediately removed
And the part that might work,
really only half works. The “never leave” part works, sure, it was involuntary hospitalization, but how can you explain “check out any time you like?” Letting patients fake a check-out just seems like torture.
I’m not 100% certain on my take, but some of your attempts to shoot it down are kind of Reddit-tier pedantic. “They livin’ it up” can definitely be sarcastic or even medicated altered states of being, for example.
I don’t see how he was being pendantic? He was just analyzing the song lyrics to point to another interpretation
I already gave the example of “livin’ it up” being taken so directly and literally that there’s a willing refusal to see the possible interpretations of the line as sarcasm regarding the conditions of the people mentioned, or as an altered state of consciousness from psych medications.
Or, he could be neurodivergent and tends to take things literally. Just because someone interprets something different than you (particularly something as subjective as song lyrics) doesn’t mean you have to go straight to insults.
I always thought it was about drug addiction, specifically in the music industry, which lines up a bit more with the things you pointed out imo. And I heard that checking out was a euphemism for suicide.