@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agodeez nutslemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1201
arrow-up1198imagedeez nutslemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•edit-22 years agoIf it was only an init system I’d be ok with it. But it isn’t…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoIt’s a system daemon that manages way more than an init system, hence the name “systemd”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoYou need to use its init system (systemd), its logging system (systemd-journald, and can be forwarded to old school syslog), and some dbus implementation. If that’s an unreasonable requirement for your usecase, check out OpenRC
If it was only an init system I’d be ok with it. But it isn’t…
then what would you define it as?
Everything
It’s a system daemon that manages way more than an init system, hence the name “systemd”.
You need to use its init system (systemd), its logging system (systemd-journald, and can be forwarded to old school syslog), and some dbus implementation.
If that’s an unreasonable requirement for your usecase, check out OpenRC