Voyager to [email protected]English • 2 years agoLXD: Containers for Human Beingssecluded.siteexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up170
arrow-up170external-linkLXD: Containers for Human Beingssecluded.siteVoyager to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoThey are not immutable. Might as well use a chroot at that point
minus-squareSkull giverlinkfedilink3•2 years agoWhy would they need to be immutable? Containers provide tons of isolation and sandboxing capabilities that basic chroots don’t.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-22 years agoNeither are Docker(-like) containers, at least by default. They are just not intended to keep their filesystem state outside of volumes or mounts
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoTrue but you can just blow away everything and start from scratch when something goes wrong. It also makes updates way easier
They are not immutable. Might as well use a chroot at that point
Why would they need to be immutable? Containers provide tons of isolation and sandboxing capabilities that basic chroots don’t.
Neither are Docker(-like) containers, at least by default. They are just not intended to keep their filesystem state outside of volumes or mounts
True but you can just blow away everything and start from scratch when something goes wrong. It also makes updates way easier