• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    312 years ago

    Okay so how would this be enforced? Highly unlikely any messaging service that offers E2E is going to release a version without it just to satisfy the UK government. So this will basically be easily thwarted by using a VPN?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      That’s the lovely bit about putting a bill out there. The enforcement and feasibility is not the problem of the politicians anymore.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      The bill was changed so it no longer bans e2e encryption, it’s now the responsibility of tech companies to provide protection “where technically feasible” which basically means fuck all

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        where technically feasible

        It gives something that can be argued about later, right? After other parts of the bill have begun to be implemented. So, further down the road if gvmt considers e.g. WhatsApp or Signal as having CSAM and not taking appropriate steps, then they can put pressure and WA/Signal can argue back about feasibility and merit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Does that mean that when you’re sitting on a bench in the middle of a city, you could in theory snoop the passwords and banking details in clear text from the WiFi networks around you?