• @[email protected]OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    Steam was great before epic and has been adding killer features since before egs came along. EGS tactics to win over steam users is to be anti competitive…

    • IWantToFuckSpez
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Ok but competition is always good for the customer even when the competitors are shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Ok, but as a consumer I’m fine with the shit competitor existing but I’m not going to use it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Like Walmart coming into a town to compete with the stores already there and then putting them out of business? Then moving onto the next town to compete again?

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        competition is good when the rest of the competition is able or good. EGS is so shit it has to buy exclusives and give out free games and it still doesn’t work. There has to be some equality in quality to have any chance of making steam better otherwise they just exist to make anti competitive moves, what is steam supposed to do? Also pay for exclusives?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        When their launcher is literal malware or they engage in anti-consumer practices like exclusives, no, they are not good for the customer.

        (Not that any publicly traded company can be good for the customer, mind; by definition they can only be good for the shareholders; any benefit they might accidentally provide to the customer or to society is an inefficiency that will eventually be corrected through enshittification. The only reason Valve isn’t entirely harmful is that they aren’t publicly traded yet.)