Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    You do know Capitalism was making the slave trade unfeasable. Technology is superior at mass production. It increasingly made sense to invest in machinery etc. The most skilled slaves were eventually given free reign and only had to pay a fee to their master. White nations and their Capitalist technology ended slavery - at least in the Western world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Which is perfectly in line with the Marxist doctrine of historical materialism. What is your point?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        My point is the moral and economic superiority of the Free Market works in practice (not doctrine).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Free marlets are not the same as capitalism. There have been marketa for way longer than capitalism has existed.

    • Dremor
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      It isn’t capitalism that ended slavery, but humanism.

      Capitalism, no matter how technologically advanced it is, will require employees to maintain all those machines. And what kind of employees cost the least, thus making the best profits? Slaves.

      The American civil war was capitalism vs capitalism, the only difference was that one side was more humanist than the other.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        It is only a thriving (free market) society that has the resources and time to spend on humane projects. A free market society that embraces technology requires less and less manual workers. It does require more skilled (hence free) workers - not slaves. See farming. The American war of succession - where one side humanely denied a divorce. Forced relationships are so humane!

        • Dremor
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          One side wanted to keep slaves, the other didn’t. Guess which one was humanist. And which one was capitalist (hint : answer may be both).
          The question isn’t if the war was rightful or not, is why one was for slavery and the other wasn’t. Both being capitalist, this probably isn’t the answer.
          My opinion goes toward humanism. Maybe wrong, I’m not a specialist in the history of slavery, but I doubt you are either.