Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    Even before that, Apple owes its very existence to an acquisition. Acquiring Next allowed them to abandon their dying OS and start anew with OS X, and brought back in founder Steve Jobs (who Apple had previously fired). With Steve Jobs at the helm, they made the computers cool again to buy some time before the iPod completely turned the company around.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      It was almost like NeXT was acquiring Apple for their branding, with the way it turned out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        A similar thing happened with Pixar/Disney, where post acquisition Disney Animation Studios started to work a lot more like Pixar. Interestingly, Steve Jobs was also CEO and majority shareholder at Pixar up until that acquisition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          I bet with AppleTV+ Apple is wishing Jobs integrated Pixar into Apple instead of selling to Disney.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Nah, that would’ve spread the company too thin. Apple needed that laser-focus approach they had in the iPhone days, else they’d be dead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        An incredibly rare example of ‘I won’t buy it unless you pay me to’ actually working out in real life.