@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 2 years agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square609fedilinkarrow-up12.18K
arrow-up12.18Kimagefair share?discuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square609fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoBanning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoWith or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoSo in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoIt’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.
Banning PAC money would di the same thing but literally zero representatives are proposing bills to do that.
With or without PACs, the money will find its way into politicians’ pockets.
So in what way exactly is making that statement helpful?
It’s to point out that banning PACs, while a good move, wouldn’t solve the problem. A wealth tax would be much more effective.