@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 2 years agoB-but both sideslemmy.worldimagemessage-square295fedilinkarrow-up1886
arrow-up1886imageB-but both sideslemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square295fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agothere actually is, the amount of civilians killed, because unlike the soviets, the Americans kept a leash of theirs. like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot
minus-squarePugJesuslinkfedilink2•2 years ago the Americans kept a leash of theirs. Not really. like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot Pol Pot was supported by China, not the Sovs. What’s more, Pol Pot was hardly an ‘average’ outcome.
there actually is, the amount of civilians killed, because unlike the soviets, the Americans kept a leash of theirs.
like you want to compare dictators? while bad, Pinochet killed fewer people than pol-pot
Not really.
Pol Pot was supported by China, not the Sovs. What’s more, Pol Pot was hardly an ‘average’ outcome.