cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1874605

A 17-year-old from Nebraska and her mother are facing criminal charges including performing an illegal abortion and concealing a dead body after police obtained the pair’s private chat history from Facebook, court documents published by Motherboard show.

  • LeZero
    link
    fedilink
    English
    481 year ago

    Do you have to run your lemmy instance in the US?

    Maybe do it in a less backward place

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      And how can we be sure that all the instances federated with any instance we participate on aren’t run by law enforcement themselves? I’d be surprised if there aren’t running instances by every major investigative agency themselves.

      • 🐱TheCat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is why everyone should take steps to protect their privacy. You don’t have to go 0-100 overnight. Just audit yourself and do a few things now. Keep those habits up. Then audit and add a few more things, repeat.

        I need to do this myself, I’ve been slipping

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -141 year ago

      Almost all countries have similar systems for obtaining evidence. These people were criminals, they broke the law and the legal system worked as designed to bring them to “justice”. Meta was just a pawn here with very little influence.

      If this story was about a murder rather than an abortion people would think that Meta did the right thing to bring the murderer to justice. As I see it the problem is that people disagree with the law and are using Meta as a scapegoat. But you don’t fix stupid laws by having corporations go vigilante. I’d rather not have billionaires coming up with their own set of laws, that is a recipe for disaster. I think we need to fix the laws, which will fix the root cause of this issue.

      Also use E2EE for all private information, cryptography can’t be compelled to reveal your private data by a court order.

      • LeZero
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        Do you think people who collaborated with dictatorial regimes should be excused? Because they followed the law?

        Why didnt Meta implant E2EE on their private chat service then?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          This is what I can agree with. We could blame Meta for encouraging people to give them data. Messenger does actually have E2EE encryption (apparently) but it is quite hidden and limited in functionality. If they made it the default this wouldn’t have been a position they ended up in, and they could have responded to the warrant with “We have no information matching this request.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            If they truly encrypted all chats, they would lose their value to them since its unreadable to meta as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Because they use what you say to tagert ads and keep a record of who you are. That’s how they make money.

          Which goes back to… You’re just a product. Stop using large platforms for personal shit. That’s their business model, how is it evil if most people know these companies rely on stealing as much information from you as they legally can AND they still use them.

    • lazynooblet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Every interaction on Lemmy is copied to all other federated instances. There are instances all over the world with a copy of yours and my comment. They can track and use those comments for any purpose. Its both a blessing and a curse of an open federated structure.

      • @b3nsn0wA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        they can also scrape them. that’s not really the point.

        people can dm on lemmy, and only the two instances that host the people on either end of the dm (which may even be the same instance) store that dm. that instance may actually receive a subpoena. but all of this is heavily discouraged by the lemmy interface itself, instead prompting people to set up a matrix account instead, and matrix chats are end-to-end encrypted.