• Veraticus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    They 100% thought they were. Who are you to say otherwise?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Well, the workers weren’t in control of the means of production, and democracy was but a twinkle in people’s eye by the time it ended. That’s not communism by any definition. So why call it communism?

      • Veraticus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Because the people in charge had the equivalent of many degrees in socialism, communism, and Marxism – they had written multiple books on the subject, participated in numerous conferences and lectures, and had spent most of their adult lives practicing and honing these philosophies. Lenin and Stalin believed wholeheartedly they were implementing communism throughout their entire lives and stated so multiple times. So why not call it communism?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Because there was a state, there remained a class system, and money was still in use. The three main things communism aims to do: stateless, classless, moneyless. It was socialism, with an aim toward communism, which are the tenets of Marxism-Leninism (my emphasis), a form of socialism. Communism is a different form of socialism.

          Lenin himself made this distinction.