@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoDon't be fooled Billy, it's not really a job, more of a parasitic relationshiplemmy.worldimagemessage-square284fedilinkarrow-up11.26K
arrow-up11.26KimageDon't be fooled Billy, it's not really a job, more of a parasitic relationshiplemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square284fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•2 years agoThe problem is not the landlord. They made it possible that there was a house to rent. The problem are other voters who prevent zoning laws that allow property that is cheap enough to buy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoLandlords do not build houses, they own houses. Saying that they provide housing is equivalent to saying Jeff Bezos delivered your latest Amazon package. Owning things is not creating things.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoDo you disagree with something that I wrote or are you reaffirming my point?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoThis part: They made it possible that there was a house to rent. Obviously.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoWell, didn’t they? They manage the risk that the construction of the house is profitable. You cannot build houses everywhere. If you don’t want landlords then you need public housing. That’s where the voters come in.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-22 years agoNo, most landlords just buy housing. Construction is usually a seperate business.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoHousing is only constructed because there are landlords. If the construction companies don’t sell the properties, they would become the landlords. How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-22 years ago Housing is only constructed because there are landlords. Bwahahahaha Oh wait, youre serious, let me laugh even harder
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years ago How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
The problem is not the landlord. They made it possible that there was a house to rent.
The problem are other voters who prevent zoning laws that allow property that is cheap enough to buy.
Landlords do not build houses, they own houses. Saying that they provide housing is equivalent to saying Jeff Bezos delivered your latest Amazon package.
Owning things is not creating things.
Do you disagree with something that I wrote or are you reaffirming my point?
This part:
Obviously.
Well, didn’t they? They manage the risk that the construction of the house is profitable. You cannot build houses everywhere.
If you don’t want landlords then you need public housing. That’s where the voters come in.
No, most landlords just buy housing. Construction is usually a seperate business.
Housing is only constructed because there are landlords. If the construction companies don’t sell the properties, they would become the landlords.
How do you want the housing market to work without landlords?
Bwahahahaha
Oh wait, youre serious, let me laugh even harder