@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 2 years agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square609fedilinkarrow-up12.18K
arrow-up12.18Kimagefair share?discuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square609fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoBecause the price you quoted wouldn’t be nearly enough if we built in expensive cities, it has to be built in cheap to build areas for that number to make sense.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoYes. That’s reinvestment in rural areas. Eisenhower economics.
Because the price you quoted wouldn’t be nearly enough if we built in expensive cities, it has to be built in cheap to build areas for that number to make sense.
Yes. That’s reinvestment in rural areas. Eisenhower economics.