• JasSmith
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Teachers were giving kids actual pornography. Sorry, as a parent, I have a right to demand my children not be taught how to give gay blowjobs with graphic illustrations. You went too far, and now you have to stop. Cry all you want. Most people are not okay with your degeneracy.

    Edit: one of the “children’s” books is called “Gender Queer,” and includes graphic illustrations of sex.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      None of the books being banned are pornographic. Don’t fucking lie to advance your cause of genocide

    • Razputinsgirth
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Not for nothing but gay blow jobs are practically the same as straight ones and I don’t need a book to teach me that. Also heavy doubt that that is the case

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Prove your claim. What book? Where? Or are you just making this up or maybe repeating some bullshit some other moron said?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      if we’re randomly accusing people of being pedophiles without proof, I’d start with the guy bringing up CSAM unprovoked ya know

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      I respect that you’ve provided something to back your claim up, but have you actually seen the uncensored version yet?

      It’s not what you’re claiming - it’s about how someone born female has been fantasising what it would be like to have male genitals. The ‘gay blowjob’ is the character finally trying on a strap on - which is pretty obvious in both the text and uncensored image, and then deciding pretty immediately that the fantasy was much better than the reality.

      There is a reason that websites are censoring it when they show it, and it isn’t because they’re protecting you. It’s because a half truth is much more powerful than a all-out lie, and by censoring parts out, it allows the readers to fill in the blanks with something much worse. They’re deliberately trying to deceive you, to rile you up, and keep you coming back to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      That seems your source sound entirely made up to get a certain delight riled up. I’d you are a victim of this misinformation please do some deeper research. If you’re just a pusher of disinformation I’m really disappointed.