@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years ago10/10content.queer.partyimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up11.31K
arrow-up11.31Kimage10/10content.queer.party@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink41•2 years agoI am fine with any format that puts the month between year and day.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoSame, but MSD->LSD is nice in general for the alphanumeric ordering
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 years ago100% alphabetical order = chronological order unambiguous regardless of locale easy to read/parse by either machine or human
minus-squarepancakeslinkfedilinkEnglish18•2 years agoThe most logical format, especially for digital files.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink85•2 years agoRFC 3339! ISO 8601 has way too many weird formats that are allowed like today would be 2023-W41-2. See for example here.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 years agoIt’s really pleasing seeing the seconds all change in unison!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•2 years agoI feel offended - W%W-%w is my preferred way of noting down dates :D
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish18•2 years agoGreat, now I need to memorize “RFC 3339”, because I officially have a new favorite date format. Thank you!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 years agoFortunately this one is easy: three threes equals 9 3339
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoRFC 3339 when you need the basics, ISO 8601 when you need something more niche. Some applications genuinely need to view the year as weeks and days of the week instead of months and days of the month.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink44•2 years agoYYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS-00:00 THE ONE TRUE FORMAT
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 years agoWell, the standard provides various formats, such as YYYY-\WWW.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoDoes the T just signify that Time starts after it? I’ve never really examined the full UTC format, YYYY-MM-DD has always been enough for my uses.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 years agoThis is the way. Put the most significant digits first. Always.
Nothing beats ISO 8601, YYYY-MM-DD
This is the way.
I am fine with any format that puts the month between year and day.
Same, but MSD->LSD is nice in general for the alphanumeric ordering
My head hurts
100%
The most logical format, especially for digital files.
RFC 3339! ISO 8601 has way too many weird formats that are allowed like today would be 2023-W41-2. See for example here.
deleted by creator
Whoa, that’s a cool website!
It’s really pleasing seeing the seconds all change in unison!
I feel offended - W%W-%w is my preferred way of noting down dates :D
Great, now I need to memorize “RFC 3339”, because I officially have a new favorite date format. Thank you!
Fortunately this one is easy:
three threes equals 9 3339
RFC 3339 when you need the basics, ISO 8601 when you need something more niche. Some applications genuinely need to view the year as weeks and days of the week instead of months and days of the month.
YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS-00:00
THE ONE TRUE FORMAT
Well, the standard provides various formats, such as YYYY-\WWW.
Does the T just signify that Time starts after it? I’ve never really examined the full UTC format, YYYY-MM-DD has always been enough for my uses.
The T stands for the timezone.
Aaaah that makes a lot of sense.
deleted by creator
BCE or AD?
This is the way.
Put the most significant digits first. Always.