• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You explained how YOU think it’s biased, and you’re still wrong. We should be scared shirtless about climate change right now. Instead, you’re pointing out incorrectly how this is biased.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      It is objectively biased for the reason stated. Being intentionally dense about that fact to push a certain narrative is not a good look.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Except it isn’t biased. It showed how warming slowly happened over a roughly 20,000 year period. Someone even gave you an example of something that would be biased and misleading and you just said no.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            Always appreciate being personally insulted. Notice, I never called you a moron, or stupid, or anything remotely close. The fact that you resorted to calling me names says more about you than it does me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              You know what, you’re right. My bad.

              Now, go tell the same thing to everyone else insulting me in this thread who aren’t even trying to provide a counterpoint.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                72 years ago

                That’s not the way this works. You insulted me. If you want to respond to the people calling names, that’s on you. I hope you’re not offended.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  I didn’t expect you to do anything, just pointing out the unhinged hate train against my wrongthink.