If you only criticize civilian casualties when Palestine resists, then your concern isn't civilian casualties. Your concern is Palestine resisting massacre.

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

If you only criticize civilian casualties when Palestine resists, then your concern isn't civilian casualties. Your concern is Palestine resisting massacre.

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

You know that the UN isn’t a reliable source on that topic ? The council for humanitarian affairs is literally full of anti semites.

And it’s near impossible to differentiate between civilians and terrorist

PlasterAnalyst · 2 years ago

Disagreement with Israel doesn’t make one an “antisemite.” I think Israel needs to read “the boy who cried wolf.”

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

No but criticism of Israel because their a Jewish state, does.

Regarding Amnesty International https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-000932-ASW_EN.html

The UNHRC is notorious anti Israel and condemning everything they do but also according to them „isis did nothing wrong“

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

The UN actually down plays Palestinian casualties. Other sources estimate them much higher.

macniel · 2 years ago

and who do you trust then?

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

I can tell you who I don’t

Amisty International UN Human Right Council Arab Media

Those three have a proven anti semitic background.

macniel · 2 years ago

that wasnt my question.

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

But I still answered it. It’s just easier to name everyone I especially don’t trust, than Name the dozens I do.

norbert · 2 years ago

Who do you trust then? Who’s reputable?

@[email protected] · 2 years ago

I bet they trust Times of Israel implicitly.

For those not in the know: Times of Israel is more anti-Palestinian than Ron DeSantis is anti-trans and almost as pro-Netanyahu as Trump is pro-Trump.