@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-22 years agoSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up193
arrow-up193imageSemantic arguments, part 2 (Hard Mode: No Pulaski... *and no Julian for lack of spots)lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-22 years agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-22 years agoYeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoWell, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoFair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
minus-squareStamets [Mirror]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoThe fact that inflammable and flammable mean the same thing in reality still fucking infuriates me.
Because he’s not listed, Julian.
Yeah, him too. Look, I had 6 spots and several shows to cover. Not to mention his lack of ethics in dating his patients.
Well, if I was deemed a criminal by the act of existing, I wouldn’t care a lot about ethics either.
Fair enough, I would have given any name that wasn’t on the list, I mean, Tom Paris was a doc for a short bit, right? (My collectors plate has it in a footnote)
Field medic with basic training.
Inflammable means flammable? What a starship.
The fact that inflammable and flammable mean the same thing in reality still fucking infuriates me.