The reasons why Star Trek: Deep Space Nine never got a movie explained.

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine ended in 1999 after 7 seasons but didn’t jump into feature films like The Next Generation. Here’s why.

  • ℕ𝕠𝕓𝕠𝕕𝕪 𝕆𝕗𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝English
    9•2 years ago

    Financial reasons played a major role in the lack of a DS9 movie, as the sets for the show were extremely expensive and surpassed those of TNG.

    wonder if they can make a budget utilising the backdrop live screen that is used in the “mandalorian” and the “ashoka” starwars movie today

      • The Bard in GreenEnglish
        7•2 years ago

        Which is too bad. A movie would be the perfect way to wrap up the Ben Sisko story.

        • @[email protected]OPEnglish
          5•2 years ago

          Personally I’d be okay recasting the role. I’d totally buy that his experiences with the founders could change him physically.

    • @[email protected]English
      11•2 years ago

      IMO, it wouldn’t work well.

      The DS9 set was complicated. You had obstructions and levels. Those would need to be replicated with green screen props and they tend to not bother with those. At best you’ll get uncanny valley like the Romulan Bridge in S1 Picard. Works for a specific scene, but isn’t something to dwell in.