All that has to happen is someone has to say “yes, I understand that it is weird that gay dudes in dresses demand access to and influence over children, but I still choose to give them that access and influence.” Please, fuck up your stupid children however you would like. Send them to Boy Scouts to get molested or put them in organized sports to get hazed and abused. Just don’t lie about what happens.
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other.
NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop.
READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
You are not being objective here and your bias has poisoned every single point you’re trying to make. Know what? Don’t try again. Go yell into a garbage can instead.
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
All that has to happen is someone has to say “yes, I understand that it is weird that gay dudes in dresses demand access to and influence over children, but I still choose to give them that access and influence.” Please, fuck up your stupid children however you would like. Send them to Boy Scouts to get molested or put them in organized sports to get hazed and abused. Just don’t lie about what happens.
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other. NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop. READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
You are not being objective here and your bias has poisoned every single point you’re trying to make. Know what? Don’t try again. Go yell into a garbage can instead.
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
Oops, you’re wrong again and clearly can’t see why. Try again bro.
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.