alt text

tweet by Johann Hari: The core of addiction is not wanting to be present in life, because pour life is too painful a place to be. This is why imposing more pain or punishment on a person with an addiction problem actually makes their addiction worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      that’s your view, there’s very different types of drugs, and not all hard drugs are harmful. Putting people doing harmless ‘crimes’ in jail, that is what is harmful to society.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        What would you consider a “hard drug” that isn’t harmful? Isn’t its very definition a way to distinguish them from soft drugs which are less harmful?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Afaik only cannabis and alcohol are considered soft drugs. Cannabis actually has quite a few people addicted to it. Alcohol does an incredible amount of harm to health and society. Take a look at shrooms, which are usually considered hard-drugs: no-one is addicted to it, it’s not bad for your health, it’s actually a very healing experience and is being considered more and more as a proper treatment for psychological problems. Shrooms are usually consumed very responsibly, there are of course always some idiots who don’t know what they are doing. Still they’re considered hard drugs and conservative minded people often don’t want to hear about legalization, without any rational argument.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Shrooms are a valid argument, I’ve seen them categorized as both. I was more talking about stuff that is pretty much universally deemed a “hard drug”, like cocaine, heroin, ecstasy or meth.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Yeah I think cocaine, heroine and meth are not to be messed with, I my view they’re bad for you. I think ecstasy is on another level. Where I live it’s the most commonly used hard drugs and I think most people use it in a healthy manner. That is to say a few times per year max, they go to a festival, they dance their asses off and they share a hug. The problem with ecstasy is that it can be a gateway drugs. It gives such an incredible feeling of happiness that people will want to relive it the next weekend, but that will never work. If you can manage to not give in to that and just wait a few months, then all is well. But if you give in and go again next week, you won’t reach the same heights. People will suggest you take other stuff to help overcome this, designer drugs, speed, cocaine, etc. and then things go downhill. I think ecstasy in itself, with moderation, is not an unhealthy thing to do. I think it has clear psychological benefits to use it occasionally.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Eh, I’d say that’s still way too dangerous for public consumption.

                I read it could have benefits too, but that’s not enough of a reason for full legalization imo. Supervised usage in restricted environments for therapeutic purposes could be possible, but any more than that will make the risks outweigh the benefits by too much.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Hmm, I don’t quite understand that sentiment. It’s really not that dangerous. Alcohol is a thousand times more dangerous.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 years ago

                    I mean, you said yourself it’s something that should be used a few times a year max. Leaving something like that as easily obtainable whenever you want seems a recipe for disaster.

                    Alcohol can be dangerous, but only if you drink a fuckton or if you do on a daily basis (and even then, it has to be a certain level of alcohol because one glass of wine per day isn’t really that harmful). It should definitely be regulated better, but saying it’s more dangerous than ecstasy seems a bit too much.

                    Anyway there isn’t really much of a point in discussing any further whether stuff like ecstasy should be fully legalized or not when plain old cannabis is still illegal in most of the world. Let’s first do the stuff we (almost?) everyone agree with.