@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 2 years agoFree market innovation at its finestlemmy.worldimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.46K
arrow-up11.46KimageFree market innovation at its finestlemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square129fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoSo would sand and talc powder. Diamond dust. It’s cheap and doesn’t hurt you. There are more food like things that will fix it that are more expensive.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 years agoCellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.
minus-squarekaselinkfedilink1•2 years ago There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust. Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•2 years agoI don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same. I’d much rather eat cellulose.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoWhat? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoWe’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoWell there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?
minus-squarehtrayllinkfedilink3•2 years agoYup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.
So would sand and talc powder. Diamond dust.
It’s cheap and doesn’t hurt you. There are more food like things that will fix it that are more expensive.
Cellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.
Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet
High fibre diets already exist.
True, but I was thinking sawdust diet lol
I don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same.
I’d much rather eat cellulose.
I appreciate this joke
What? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.
We’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.
Well there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?
Yup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.