@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-square324fedilinkarrow-up11.2K
arrow-up11.2Kmessage-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square324fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 years agoThat is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoHave you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia? The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.
That is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.