Do you realize that just saying no to everything doesn’t constitute an actual discussion? How about giving an actual reason or logic for what you’re arguing rather than just saying no increasingly louder like a child. Or is that what your priest told you when you started asking questions?
What you have offered, Fishshake, is not discussion at all, but a toddler-like repetition of the word “no” as though you are just now learning the power of language. Congratulations on your personal milestone there, buddy. But I don’t feel like waiting for you to reach maturity so I am blocking you now. Feel free to have the last word, and be sure to “no” it all to hell so that others can get a laugh out of it too. Buhbye.
Moral reality. There it is. This dude personally thinks it’s wrong, which means with no other good reason every single other person in the country must go along with it. If you think a divorce is morally wrong, don’t get one. Knock yourself out. Find a partner who doesn’t want to get one. But you have no right to force that belief onto others.
No. You should be able to leave a marriage for whatever reason you want. There should be a small barrier to avoid overloading the courts, but that’s it.
Divorce isn’t shameful. You have no idea why people get divorced. Your immaturity is showing bright and clear in these comments. You sound like I did in middle school.
Why do you believe that? I mean, I can understand if you personally don’t want to get divorced, but what about other people ? Would you restrict their ability to get divorced because of your personal belief?
Should all people who get divorced and remarried be forced back into their original marriage?
Trying to keep someone in a marriage that they do not want to be in is inherently abusive, so trying to prove it in the event that one party did not allow the marriage to be ended would be redundant.
People can already divorce if they are being abused or cheated on. By making it a legal requirement that must be proven you make it more difficult for these people to leave those marriages and put the burden of proof onto them. You aren’t going to reduce domestic abuse with a policy like that.
No.
Both sides should agree or you should have to prove infidelity or abuse.
Domestic abusers love this idea
I think you mean hate.
Can you provide us a detailed description of how divorces and marriages should work instead of one sentences per comment? I’m genuinely curious.
No.
No dummy, this type of shit is exactly what increases domestic violence, spousal rape, and spousal murder.
Time to grow the fuck up and realize a wife isn’t a sex doll combined with a domestic servant.
If this is your religion telling you this then fuck your religion, and any other religion that offers abusive lines of thinking like this.
No, it isn’t. This is the kind of thing that prevents abuse. Stop believing otherwise.
The facts don’t care about your feelings, idiot (and the facts say you’re completely wrong).
Do you realize that just saying no to everything doesn’t constitute an actual discussion? How about giving an actual reason or logic for what you’re arguing rather than just saying no increasingly louder like a child. Or is that what your priest told you when you started asking questions?
He’s a “feelings, not facts” kind of guy. You can’t win with logic, only the block button.
Amen to that, pal.
Are you saying that a cons’ primal scream of rage is not an actual argument? How dare you!
/s
Some discussions don’t merit justification.
What you have offered, Fishshake, is not discussion at all, but a toddler-like repetition of the word “no” as though you are just now learning the power of language. Congratulations on your personal milestone there, buddy. But I don’t feel like waiting for you to reach maturity so I am blocking you now. Feel free to have the last word, and be sure to “no” it all to hell so that others can get a laugh out of it too. Buhbye.
Most people don’t deserve discussions either. Most people deserve to have reality shoved in their face.
You’re describing enabling domestic abuse, even though you think you aren’t.
No.
Abuse can be proven in a court.
And it should be required to be.
Lol, tell me you think you should be able to abuse your wife without just SAYING “I should be able to abuse my wife if I wanna!”
Did some hurt you? Was you no longer able to abuse or control someone? Because you feel really strongly about this. Our are you just trolling?
I feel strongly about this because it’s a moral reality.
Marriage should be incredibly hard to get out of.
But why? What’s your reasoning behind why people divorcing or wanting out of a relationship is a bad thing?
https://lemmy.world/comment/4885170
Smells like a troll to me.
Then should it also be incredibly hard to get into?
Moral reality. There it is. This dude personally thinks it’s wrong, which means with no other good reason every single other person in the country must go along with it. If you think a divorce is morally wrong, don’t get one. Knock yourself out. Find a partner who doesn’t want to get one. But you have no right to force that belief onto others.
Yeah, but if they are a conservative, they generally adhere to the Southern version of “liberty” - meaning, having the “liberty” to rule over others.
Maybe like the other poster said it should be harder to get married then less people wouldn’t have to get divorced.
No. You should be able to leave a marriage for whatever reason you want. There should be a small barrier to avoid overloading the courts, but that’s it.
deleted by creator
Nope. Came from a family where divorce was rightly treated as shameful.
Divorce isn’t shameful. You have no idea why people get divorced. Your immaturity is showing bright and clear in these comments. You sound like I did in middle school.
You need to go back to middle school, then.
Divorce is shameful and should not be discussed in polite society.
fuck your polite society
“should not be discussed in polite society.”
This comment proves you don’t live in reality.
Why do you believe that? I mean, I can understand if you personally don’t want to get divorced, but what about other people ? Would you restrict their ability to get divorced because of your personal belief?
Should all people who get divorced and remarried be forced back into their original marriage?
So kidnapping and imprisonment is what marriage is to you?
Marriage is a pact based on love and partnership, what you’re suggesting is slavery.
You got some major incel vibes going on bro, time to take yourself to a licensed mental health professional.
Trying to keep someone in a marriage that they do not want to be in is inherently abusive, so trying to prove it in the event that one party did not allow the marriage to be ended would be redundant.
People can already divorce if they are being abused or cheated on. By making it a legal requirement that must be proven you make it more difficult for these people to leave those marriages and put the burden of proof onto them. You aren’t going to reduce domestic abuse with a policy like that.
Boy, have you ever got that wrong.
I smell a troll