@[email protected] to Aussie [email protected] • 2 years agoEscaping underground: the eerie new age of bushfire bunkerswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up126cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up126external-linkEscaping underground: the eerie new age of bushfire bunkerswww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to Aussie [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•edit-22 years agoI reckon two people could spend five hours in that bunker safely. But often you’d only be in there for 15 minutes. It doesn’t take that long for the worst of a fire front to pass by.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years ago5 hours is better than I thought, i can see as a last resort in that case it’s better than anywhere else you could shelter
minus-squareTheHolmlinkfedilink1•2 years agoCO2 absorbers is not a high tech thing. It can be useful additions.
I reckon two people could spend five hours in that bunker safely.
But often you’d only be in there for 15 minutes. It doesn’t take that long for the worst of a fire front to pass by.
5 hours is better than I thought, i can see as a last resort in that case it’s better than anywhere else you could shelter
CO2 absorbers is not a high tech thing. It can be useful additions.