@[email protected] to A Boring [email protected] • 2 years agoWhat a third world war would mean for investorswww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1170cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1170external-linkWhat a third world war would mean for investorswww.economist.com@[email protected] to A Boring [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agois it not the next ‘world war’ if it doesn’t include nukes? i don’t think the stupid war shit is quite there yet, but it’s happening.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoI think a Middle East driven world war could have zero to very few nukes… Europe driven? Kiss your butt goodbye.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoyou’re not the real ‘poem for your sprog’ person. i don’t exactly disagree with you, but i wonder why you chose that specific handle. you aren’t a poet. what are you doing?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoi’m not pretending to be someone i’m not.
is it not the next ‘world war’ if it doesn’t include nukes? i don’t think the stupid war shit is quite there yet, but it’s happening.
I think a Middle East driven world war could have zero to very few nukes…
Europe driven? Kiss your butt goodbye.
you’re not the real ‘poem for your sprog’ person. i don’t exactly disagree with you, but i wonder why you chose that specific handle. you aren’t a poet. what are you doing?
What are you doing?
i’m not pretending to be someone i’m not.
Neither am I?