@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoThe Netherlandsmander.xyzimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up11.57K
arrow-up11.57KimageThe Netherlandsmander.xyz@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-squareikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoCar in the bike lane
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•2 years agoDutchie here to explain why that’s not ironic: If its a dotted line cars are allowed to use it, but only if it doesn’t impede on cyclists. So while they didn’t have to be there, it’s not unlawful as there’s no cyclists. If it was a single line, it’s a different story.
minus-squareIWantToFuckSpezlinkfedilink5•2 years agoIt’s a shared road. Not separated lanes. Hence the dotted lines.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•2 years agoThat isn’t a bike lane, it is a bike suggestion strip (translated literally).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoIt’s a bike strip, since there is a bike icon. A bike suggestion strip has no bike icon and has no legal status, it’s merely a suggestion. They are different things.
Car in the bike lane
Dutchie here to explain why that’s not ironic:
If its a dotted line cars are allowed to use it, but only if it doesn’t impede on cyclists. So while they didn’t have to be there, it’s not unlawful as there’s no cyclists.
If it was a single line, it’s a different story.
It’s a shared road. Not separated lanes. Hence the dotted lines.
That isn’t a bike lane, it is a bike suggestion strip (translated literally).
It’s a bike strip, since there is a bike icon.
A bike suggestion strip has no bike icon and has no legal status, it’s merely a suggestion.
They are different things.