• Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Churchill was a racist idiot and that’s still a dumb quote.

      Democracy is a plane with 20 people on it. Nine vote not to crash it and eleven vote to fly it into a mountain, and that means everyone dies because democracy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        No, nine vote to crash it, seven vote to go left and four vote to go right.

        Crashing it is! Thanks, first past the post voting system.

      • Bipta
        link
        fedilink
        50
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        So instead you choose authoritarianism: 20 people on a plan and one of them shoots the pilot, takes over, and crashes it. Everyone dies.

        • PugJesus
          link
          fedilink
          302 years ago

          Yeah, the problems with democracy are rarely solved by less democracy. It just turns into “Instead of many idiots voting to do something stupid, one idiot votes to do something stupid.”

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Love how you think that not only are there only two options, but that democracy isn’t also authoritarian. It’s just mob rule instead of an individual.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That’s… precisely why the original quote said “democracy is the worst form of government”. It has fundamental flaws. But it’s still the better than everything else.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Think bigger. Fly the plane in circles, and demand the people give you whatever you want to occasionally land it and bring some supplies onboard.

          Just don’t die of old age.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s more like,

        • 2 hijackers vote to crash
        • 1 votes with the hijackers because they share a hometown
        • 2 vote no
        • another 2 vote strong no
        • the other 12 don’t participate because they don’t want to get too political (we have 40% voter turnout where I live)

        and I’ve been through enough elections to see how we are all heading to a crash, every time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        342 years ago

        Churchill’s point is that stupid things can still happen in democracies, but no one has come up with a better alternative. What would you suggest as the better alternative? If you don’t have one, then you just helped prove Churchill’s point!

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Every human knows and has used a superior system from the time they first started playing with other people: Consensus.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            272 years ago

            …which is basically what democracy is, but systemitized such that it can be applied at scale.

                • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  Yes and we should all agree on who is going to represent us. Otherwise the losing party is disenfranchised.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    102 years ago

                    You’re not going to get unanimous approval for anything when your group size is several thousand people

            • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Democracy is majority rule, and fuck whatever the minority wants.

              Consensus is we don’t do anything unless we all agree.

                • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  So the only way to get anything done is to do it against the will of at least some people? You’ve never been in a group where you agreed on a course of action together?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    7
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    In a group… you mean a very limited setting where you can discuss directly with everyone and get direct feedback in real time from everyone?

                    How do you suggest that this might work on a large scale, with millions of people?

                    Edit: And if for example 10 million people somehow found consensus and then one guy is like “lmao no”, everything gets canned?

            • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              Your shoe has a pretty good knowledge of anarchism. You could learn a thing or two from it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        But if we made you running everything it would be perfect.

        That’s the thing with anti-democracy sentiment the people who advocate for it always assume they, or someone who agrees with them on everything, is going to run things. No one imagines themselves in a slave society being a slave.