@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up152cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up152external-linkTrying Out & Benchmarking Bcachefs On Linux 6.7www.phoronix.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink9•1 year agoThat startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
minus-squareChewylinkfedilink3•1 year agoYes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
minus-squareProtonBadgerlinkfedilink3•edit-21 year agoYes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoIt’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O
That startup time test seems a little sus for BTRFS
Very much so.
Yes, I’m surprised it is so bad considering btrfs was close to the other fs on most benchmarks.
Yes, it seems like there could be a weakness there, unless it’s just a fluke. The test has a background I/O load designed to stress BFQ I/O.
It’s not just startup time, it’s startup time with heavy background I/O