@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agobut idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1919
arrow-up1919imagebut idk tholemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 years agoWell only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYAlinkfedilink14•2 years agoYou can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoWhere might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
minus-squareFlying SquidMlinkfedilink3•2 years agoLet’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-22 years agoTheoretically, I had underetood the opposite.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.