Stamets [Mirror] to [email protected] • 2 years agoIt's just the most 100 recently saved songs. The fuck.startrek.websiteimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1343
arrow-up1343imageIt's just the most 100 recently saved songs. The fuck.startrek.websiteStamets [Mirror] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 years agoWhy the fuck is this downvoted??? They are absolutely right A link for the uneducated and ignorant: https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/bridle-ways-of-being-excerpt-computer-randomness.html
minus-squarePrivateNooblinkfedilink5•2 years agoThey probably didn’t like my nerdy joke. I see the argument that it’s kinda not the topic, but we are talking about randomness. It sounded fun in my head.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoBecause it’s not the reason. Pseudorandom number generation is statistically identical to random.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoIt absolutely is part of the reason and your little “statistically identical” line is reductive as fuck. You clearly are not a programmer and don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about
Why the fuck is this downvoted??? They are absolutely right
A link for the uneducated and ignorant: https://slate.com/technology/2022/06/bridle-ways-of-being-excerpt-computer-randomness.html
They probably didn’t like my nerdy joke. I see the argument that it’s kinda not the topic, but we are talking about randomness. It sounded fun in my head.
Because it’s not the reason. Pseudorandom number generation is statistically identical to random.
It absolutely is part of the reason and your little “statistically identical” line is reductive as fuck.
You clearly are not a programmer and don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about