• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Your point being the USSR was influential because it was… what evil?

    Doesn’t it make sense they were influential because they were like the only socialist state at the time? And they actually did support many, if not most, anti-colonial and leftist movements all over the world. Like, if you were a leftist in Africa, and needed help fighting against colonialism and stuff, there was only the USSR around to help you. And they did help, a lot.

    They had the largest increase in quality of life in history prior to China, they pioneered space exploration and computation. They had the most advanced laws to protect minorities, to guarantee equality for women etc. Their universities were free for people on the 2nd AND 3rd world to attend.

    How exactly were they so terrible? And please, don’t list things every country did exactly the same or worse.

    Or do you think all the good they did is completely nullified by the bad?

    Would it be best for humans to stop trying to do good, never try to learn from the bad, and just give up?

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I recommend reading Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia!

      It’s a great read and gives a lot of insights into the dynamics I’m describing. The infighting between leftist fractions gets pretty technical, but Orwell does a great job with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Orwell is a piece of shit traitor who worked for the UK government to fight communists. AND he was a racist piece of shit. I will never read any books by him, thanks.

        I refuse to read explicit anti-communists who worked for fascists states outing communists and disrupting their parties.

        • David Barkin
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          @novibe @sab

          Orwell fought in Spain against Franco. You have some odd definitions of “Anti_Communist.”

          He hated Stalin? So did everyone who could read and write.

          • sab
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Orwell is pretty much universally hated by authoritarians on both sides of the political spectrum.

            He’s a personal hero of mine for many reasons, but that’s certainly one of them.

              • sab
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                To be fair, Orwell writes in Homage to Catalonia that even though he fought alongside Communists, he was there to fight against fascism, not for communism. I think it makes sense that the communists are not all that eager to praise him; that they are too ignorant to read him is their loss.

                No matter how you put it, Stalin was certainly a more effective anti-Communist!

                • David Barkin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  @sab @db0 @boredtortoise @novibe

                  Actually he completely supported those he fought with. The “Poum” were Trotskyists, and could call themselves Communists.

                  Orwell had no problem with them, and there’s Nothing in "Homage to Catalonia which attacks their ideals.

                  • sab
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 years ago

                    True, I always read him as at least sympathetic to the original communist struggle, no matter how much he despised Stalinism and authoritarianism.

                    It does, however, make sense that people who in all likelihood consider themselves Stalinists wouldn’t be the biggest fans of Orwell. What doesn’t make sense is that these morons still exist at all, but that’s a different issue entirely.