• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Unless it’s from China or any communist allies.

    Or any other foreign entity. The Bill of Rights wasn’t written to protect foreign governments or business interests.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      or business interests.

      According to the Supreme Court, businesses have human rights, are you defending the violation of human rights?

      How the turn tables.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        foreign governments or business interests.

        Obviously meaning foreign governments or foreign business interests. Not sure how you misunderstood that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 years ago

          I see, the USA should work on banning Toyota, Samsung, Siemens, Nestle and etc.

          Actually, just banning Nestlé for their slavery practices in Africa would be good enough.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            100% agree about Neslte. And I’d be happy to expand the requirements to do business with America to include adhering to US labor regulations.

            But do you at least understand how the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply to this conversation at all now?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 years ago

              100% agree about Neslte. And I’d be happy to expand the requirements to do business with America to include adhering to US labor regulations.

              Make it United Nations labor regulations and we’re set for a good time, comrade.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Sure, that sounds good and all but do you understand the UN doesn’t have any legal power over its member nations? I’m interested in realistic, enforceable legal outcomes, not utopian dreams.

                Your idealism is fun, but you really need to read more and travel some to start peeling off that thick layer of naivety.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Sadly there’s a good chance Trump will win and implement the GOP’s project of Child Labor in the US.

                  I’m interested in realistic, enforceable legal outcomes, not utopian dreams.

                  America already follows many international regulations and applies them with the rule of the law.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 years ago

                    Ah, I get it, you meant the US should voluntarily adopt UN labor regulations over defining their own because you assume UN regulations would be categorically better than what the US would ever define on their own.

                    Have you ever actually researched that or you just go from the premise that UN is better than the US because it’s not the US and the US is bad?