And no IPad version to

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      862 years ago

      Yes it is, and because of who owns it, I would even prefer that to an unsandboxed closed source native binary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        212 years ago

        Pretty much I’ll never understand why people want their webpages to be apps with access to all your shit

        • FarLine99
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          it is convenient mostly for developers, not people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          It’s because the vast, vast, VAST majority of people have no idea that many apps are just showing a website. Also, the app version is almost always more efficient in terms of precious phone screen real estate compared to a browser. Apps also remember who you are so you don’t have to login. It isn’t hard to understand why people like them.

          That said, many apps are horrible from a privacy perspective. But that is largely hidden from the average user, most of whom simply don’t think much about online privacy anyway.

          I hope the ubiquity of irritating ads are the thin edge of the wedge that gets more people interested in ad-blocking, and then perhaps online privacy more generally.

    • Richard
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes, but no calls, because apparently a browser doesnt have microphone and speaker support

      • spez
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Whatsapp does their calls over voIP anyways right?

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      works without a phone nearby nowadays?

      Last time I checked it kicked me out for no reason… But in a nutshell yes.