• Vexz
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Why would they want to stop? This is their fight against adblockers and on Chromium based browsers it’s an effective way so of course they keep pushing. ;)

      • RandomLegend [He/Him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I don’t want to hear the realistic argumentation of why this is proceeding. I want to live in my fantasy headspace where comments like this can stop superpower megacorps from being assholes…okay? 😅

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      That’s what happens in a quasi monopoly. They would suffer no consequences from it and the others like Mozilla would just have to follow along.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Mozilla will want to be API-compatible, but there’s nothing inherent to the API that requires the arbitrary content-blocking limitation that Google put in. So, Mozilla will be API-compatible without adopting this shitty limitation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Manifest V3 isn’t just an arbitrary limitation on numbers; it also includes limitations on allowing the lists to be downloaded dynamically, and on blocking elements on pages dynamically

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Interesting, I didn’t know that, but it doesn’t really change anything about my comment. Mozilla can offer APIs in addition to what Manifest v3 offers, allowing extensions that want to do these things to do them. It’s already the case today, for example, that uBlock Origin makes use of additional APIs for more effective ad blocking on Firefox.