@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 years ago95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1123cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1123image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.com@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoThe screenshot displays 3 decimal places, which is the the precision I used. As it turns out, even just rounding to the nearest integer still requires checking more numbers than we even have the primes enumerated for (e^200 or 7x10^86)
The screenshot displays 3 decimal places, which is the the precision I used. As it turns out, even just rounding to the nearest integer still requires checking more numbers than we even have the primes enumerated for (e^200 or 7x10^86)
Ah, ok yeah that makes sense.