@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 2 years agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.13Kcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.13Kexternal-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.com@[email protected] to World [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square159fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoYeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so. We should eat less meat though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoWe sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.
Yeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so.
We should eat less meat though.
We sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.