@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 2 years agothis technology suffers from high latencylemmy.mlimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up11.29K
arrow-up11.29Kimagethis technology suffers from high latencylemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squarekeepcarrot [she/her]linkfedilinkEnglish10•2 years agoReminds be of the conversations about transferring hard drives using the public transport system in my city. Good bandwidth, terrible latency. Then everyone got faster internet and stopped pirating
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years ago“Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.” – Andrew Tanenbaum
minus-squarekeepcarrot [she/her]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoMy dad had tapes, but I never got to see data go from a tape to ram. They had 8 GB of space, I remember
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoTapes hold a lot more now. LTO-9 tapes hold 18 TB and IBM 3592 Gen 6 tapes hold 50 TB.
Reminds be of the conversations about transferring hard drives using the public transport system in my city. Good bandwidth, terrible latency. Then everyone got faster internet and stopped pirating
“Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.” – Andrew Tanenbaum
My dad had tapes, but I never got to see data go from a tape to ram. They had 8 GB of space, I remember
Tapes hold a lot more now. LTO-9 tapes hold 18 TB and IBM 3592 Gen 6 tapes hold 50 TB.