Hellfire103 to [email protected]English • 2 years agoWATERsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1575
arrow-up1575imageWATERsopuli.xyzHellfire103 to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarethreelonmusketeerslinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-22 years ago roughly 2.5 times the hydrogen vs oxygen to account for inefficiencies Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoI’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react
Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
I’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react