@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agoBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up179cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up179external-linkBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.net@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFeydaikinlinkfedilink2•edit-22 years agoNot trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me. But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout. Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkSvenska2•2 years agoUsing the same engine no doubt I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
minus-squareFeydaikinlinkfedilink1•2 years agoYes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.
Not trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me.
But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout.
Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
Using the same engine no doubt
I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
Yes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.