Russian security forces raided gay clubs and bars across Moscow Friday night, less than 48 hours after the country’s top court banned what it called the “global LGBTQ+ movement” as an extremist organization.

Police searched venues across the Russian capital, including a nightclub, a male sauna, and a bar that hosted LGBTQ+ parties, under the pretext of a drug raid, local media reported.

Eyewitnesses told journalists that clubgoers’ documents were checked and photographed by the security services. They also said that managers had been able to warn patrons before police arrived.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That bill doesn’t make it illegal for transgender people to have a job in government or government adjacent. It merely prohibits them from requiring (with the force of law) other people to acknowledge their sexual identity.

    No doubt it makes it difficult from some transgender people – namely those who are unable to function if people don’t acknowledge them – to hold some jobs, though, but it doesn’t forbid it as you imply.

    This is essentially a pro freedom of speech legislation. To compare this with the Russians raiding gay bars and making “gay propaganda” illegal is preposterous.

    If I read the bill wrong, please correct me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      This is essentially a pro freedom of speech legislation.

      It’s not though. It doesn’t just protect employers to call anyone whatever pronoun they want, it mandates that the preferred pronoun for trans people (and others) are not used.

      It doesn’t just protect bigotry, it requires it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        My reading of the bill is that it specifically forbids any mandates towards pronoun use. This may enable bigotry, but does not require it.

        But perhaps you can point to the sentence that requires bigotry since I missed it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Translation: I don’t like what he says but I have no actual arguments so I’ll just ad hominem. That’ll show him.

        Thank you for, in your own peculiar way, confirming my conclusions though.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Or, I have lots of actual arguments but recognize that I’m not your dad or your professor, and that I actually just think you’re stupid and not worth the time it would take to explain it to you.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            I recognize this form of argumentation from middle school. As you are presumably an adult instead of a child, perhaps you should try to improve your argumentation skills quite a lot before continuing these “actual arguments” you claim to have.