• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Why?

    They can’t stop us all. The only thing standing in the way of good is people who consider themselves good but stand by doing nothing while witnessing evil.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        “Dumbest thing [you] ever heard” is entirely different from “completely impossible,” you know.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

          Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Actually no its not possible to do that because if you do that some of the prisoners will become the new jailers.

            What I’m saying is that it is not actually possible for everyone to be free, because there are some people who aren’t the government who will actively kidnap and imprison other people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

            Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

            Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

            How the fuck should I know? It wasn’t my idea, nor did I endorse it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              Alright Copernicus, clearly the suggestion that it was “impossible” related to the unacceptable nature of releasing all criminals without review.

              Agree that if you enforce childish semantic literalism then yes, I was wrong. But if you have at least two functioning neurons you’d understand quite clearly what was going on.

              Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

                You get what you give, buddy.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Refuting a nonsensical idea as impossible is not “being petty”. My short response at most was “being curt” or “dismissive”.

                  You are too dumb to be in my life. See ya