Yeah that’s on purpose. That’s often used in sciences to mark significant digits.
The thing I’m confused by in yours is you’re escaping the parenthesis, so there need to be literal parenthesis in the matching number, or that’s what it showed in the regex checker.
[0-9]*\.?[0-9]*edit: ok no empty strings
[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*well sure, if you want to be fancy. i was speaking in layman terms for the rest of the world.
regex for the win.
What about imaginary numbers?
[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*[ij]?I’m not making one for mixed numbers
That regex implies “” is a number
If I had a nickel for every time that happened I’d have “” nickels.
deleted by creator
I don’t quite understand yours, why does it need parentheses? And requires the decimal point?
how about
[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*deleted by creator
Yeah that’s on purpose. That’s often used in sciences to mark significant digits.
The thing I’m confused by in yours is you’re escaping the parenthesis, so there need to be literal parenthesis in the matching number, or that’s what it showed in the regex checker.
deleted by creator
yeah but by Cantor’s diagonal argument, you still wouldn’t be listing all the real numbers