@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agoPlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)message-square49fedilinkarrow-up155
arrow-up155message-squarePlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink8•2 years agoI thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•edit-22 years agoOnly when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink2•2 years agoThanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
minus-squarecircuitfarmerlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoTo my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteachlinkfedilink1•2 years agoAccording to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).