@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 1 year agoPeak engineeringlemmy.worldimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1994
arrow-up1994imagePeak engineeringlemmy.world@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish94•1 year agoHow the actual fuck did this get through QA and production?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish23•edit-21 year agoQA budget is real low. They can only afford the ones that are bare copper stuffed into a RJ45. If they’re lucky a DIY job with no exposed pairs outside the RJ45
minus-squarejackeryjoolinkfedilinkEnglish56•1 year agoThe protective boot is optional on the RJ45 CAT5/6 specification. I suspect they likely didn’t test with all the different RJ45 variants dongles.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish25•edit-21 year agoIf the client has enough money for Cisco hardware they can definitely afford the boogie RJ45 with Booties.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish34•1 year agoBougie, unless they’re just funky as fuck.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year agoi read it exactly as it was written and now I’m imagining RJ45s in an earth wind and fire music video
How the actual fuck did this get through QA and production?
QA budget is real low. They can only afford the ones that are bare copper stuffed into a RJ45.
If they’re lucky a DIY job with no exposed pairs outside the RJ45
The protective boot is optional on the RJ45 CAT5/6 specification. I suspect they likely didn’t test with all the different RJ45 variants dongles.
If the client has enough money for Cisco hardware they can definitely afford the boogie RJ45 with Booties.
Bougie, unless they’re just funky as fuck.
i read it exactly as it was written and now I’m imagining RJ45s in an earth wind and fire music video