stopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 1 year agoArtists are making creative companies apologize for using AIwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1199
arrow-up1199external-linkArtists are making creative companies apologize for using AIwww.theverge.comstopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-squareShurimallinkfedilink8•1 year agoNo-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.
minus-square520linkfedilink8•edit-21 year ago But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works. But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles. Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoYou should check out this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF. The EFF is a digital rights group who recently won a historic case: border guards now need a warrant to search your phone.
deleted by creator
No-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.
deleted by creator
But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles.
Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.
You should check out this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF. The EFF is a digital rights group who recently won a historic case: border guards now need a warrant to search your phone.