@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoYouTubefile.coffeeimagemessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up11.41K
arrow-up11.41KimageYouTubefile.coffee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square279fedilink
minus-squareMentalEdgelinkfedilink5•1 year agoThat’s a very bad analogy. That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases. By all means, defect when warranted, but if a bad company changing course doesn’t net rewards, why would corps ever do anything other than the worst possible, taking as many users down with them as they can snare?
minus-square@[email protected]BlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases. Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
That’s a very bad analogy.
That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases.
By all means, defect when warranted, but if a bad company changing course doesn’t net rewards, why would corps ever do anything other than the worst possible, taking as many users down with them as they can snare?
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases.
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.