ekZepp to Star Wars [email protected]English • 1 year agoNot Sparks.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up1401
arrow-up1401imageNot Sparks.lemmy.worldekZepp to Star Wars [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square167fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year agoThe difference is that the prequels are still enjoyable, entertaining films with a lot of good aspects. The sequels aren’t.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoEpisode 1 in is entertaining. 2 and 3 are just awful. Especially 2.
minus-squareRicky RigatonilinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year ago3 is great once order 66 starts at least. first half or so of 3 is pretty boring. I choose to forget about 2 because it was just a load of nothing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 year agoYou have to admit, it was a very bold decision to make a trilogy about the Clone Wars and then not show the Clone Wars until someone decided to make a show about a child soldier in a tube top.
The difference is that the prequels are still enjoyable, entertaining films with a lot of good aspects.
The sequels aren’t.
Episode 1 in is entertaining. 2 and 3 are just awful. Especially 2.
3 is great once order 66 starts at least. first half or so of 3 is pretty boring.
I choose to forget about 2 because it was just a load of nothing.
You have to admit, it was a very bold decision to make a trilogy about the Clone Wars and then not show the Clone Wars until someone decided to make a show about a child soldier in a tube top.
Uh, no?
No