• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    First: she doesn’t need to say anything specifically or explicitly to be a transphobe actively hostile to the existence of trans people.

    Second: she says things and creates spaces that are very specifically and explicitly hostile to the existence of trans people.

    Third: she associates with and collaborates with people who openly advocate for “reductions in trans people”.

    Honestly I could go through my understanding of her issue, but many people have spoken at great length about why her behavior is harmful. If you’re truly interested seek them out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      ‘hostile to the existence of trans people’ “reductions in trans people”

      either she genuinely wants genocide or youre being intentuonally misleading, this sounds like hitler describing jews.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          thats horrible but if so thats totally illegal and she’d be imprisoned, can you provide a source.

          • apotheotic (she/her)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            You can search up “jk Rowling transphobic” or “jk Rowling anti trans” and you’ll find a plethora of sources yourself, this isn’t really a controversial thing. She’s the most well loved transphobe in the world.